*S-T-R-E-T-C-H TIME to create a life we want: Five Steps
"Days just aren't long enough!" "I just can't get everything done in time!" "Too many projects and not enough time!"
Hold on. Maybe there's a solution. Maybe there's another way to look at the problem. The comments above illustrate the idea that time is limited. "There aren't enough hours in the day!" A day is only so long and that isn't enough.
Another way to view time is to see that it is unlimited. How do we do that? How do we figure out how to stretch the time we have? How do we get to create the life we want?
According to Howard Falco, we can change our perception of time. How do we interpret ourselves and the world? Our experience of time and how all things come together for us is rooted in that interpretation. "Learn to understand and trust the process of life. The universe birthed us into existence -- and we are the magnificent and perfect result." If that's true, then the universe will continue to support us on our journey through life. Less fear, less uncertainty; instead, more confidence, more peace. We can trust that our journey is as it should be. No need to hurry, scurry, worry. Whatever our intentions are when it comes to creativity, we can act on them. But we can do it in a way that reduces pressure on us and allows for more peace in the process.
Look at each moment as a teaching moment. How can we "work with life and learn from all challenges along the way?" This approach to our lives engenders "a powerful state of mind and has direct impact on our experience of time". Thus, the struggle to achieve becomes easier; we're not feeling like we are going against the current; we're in a mindset that allows us to go with the flow. It's amazing to see how what we want to have happen occurs naturally, without forcing or pressuring it to occur.
"To really master time, we must be willing to open ourselves up to a new way of looking at it." Try these 5 steps suggested by Falco:
1. Immediately stop living in regret. Give up "woulda, coulda, shoulda". Accept who we are in this moment. Focus our creative energy on honoring this newfound acceptance.
2. Trust there is a reason for every challenge and circumstance. Things are happening for us, not to us. "To everything, there is a season," go the famous words. Having expectations of the universe for what we want and when we want it actually works to add time to our journey.
3. Be present as much as possible. By being present, we can experience any messages that come to us through every person, situation and moment. If we're not paying attention, if we're moving too fast, we can miss valuable information life is presenting to us which would stretch our learning curve -- which in turn stretches time.
4. Learn to act on initial instincts. Don't hesitate or think too much. Acting on instincts allows us the fastest way to get from A to B as it relates to what we want. Determine to utilize instincts more. Have faith to go with the flow.
5. Build the faith to see time is never wasted. Each moment has purpose. Things of which we are unaware can be happening under the surface and working in our favor. "This helps to dissolve fear, resistance and pressure and increases crucial energy of faith. The more we can come to embrace that for this moment this is exactly where we are supposed to be on the journey, the more powerful we will become."
Mastering the precious commodity of time isn't so much about organizing it. It's much more "about the attitude we hold about ourselves and how this attitude affects every happening in our lives. Awakening to see the sacred connection between these two things by slowing down enough to be much more present is ironically the beginning of a new and much faster way of putting time on our side."
*Howard Falco, "How to Master Time: 5 Steps to Living a Timeless and Powerfully-Creative Life"
Wednesday, April 30, 2014
Sunday, April 27, 2014
HOW DID I GET HERE: Where I Stand
Taking a risk isn't half-bad. In fact, it's energizing.
I love life -- don't wish for the alternative.
Almost everybody is kind -- if I give them half a chance.
I feel alive and joyous -- most of the time.
I'm moving up -- to where I don't know.
I'm moving forward, ever forward.
I can't solve all the world's problems -- but I can damn well contribute my 2 cents worth.
When a door opens, I go through it.
I take on too many jobs but I'm convinced that, one of these days, I'll finish them all. Then die.
Life is hard but worth every minute.
I learn something new each day -- what joy!
Hurrah! I volunteer yesterday morning at our annual community clean-up. In the afternoon, I rake around my yard and fill 6 lawn bags of left-over leaves. I work for others, then at home. I give full measure of myself -- it's been a good day. It's spring in Montana!
Within the last several weeks, I settle on two goals for my Democratic campaign -- my low-key, off-the-radar, one-by-one campaign. My first goal is to get out the vote. In doing that, I want to first prepare voters, help them understand any referendum that appears on the ballot. There may be three: one on voting rights (taking away the right to register and vote the same day) and two on health care. One will expand Medicaid and the other will forbid the state from expanding Medicaid and from using funds or staff to administer the Affordable Care Act. The meaning and purpose of both of these must be made abundantly clear. It's been said that the voting rights referendum will be purposely confusing for voters.
My second goal is to focus on women and the impact that policies have on their economic well-being. This includes health-care policies, minimum-wage policies, equal pay for equal work, voting rights, all policies have an effect on women. No matter what others use as talking points, the fact that women are at least half our population means that they must be taken into account when discussing all policies.
Just how I will approach these two goals has yet to be determined. As I move forward, through research, listening and discussing policies with others, a way will become clear. Attending the Billings Chapter of League of Women Voters will supply clarity as well.
One thing I do know. My exercise program of the past two weeks will add strength to reach my goals. Walking every day, as fast as I comfortably can as far as I comfortably can, already makes a difference. Both my energy level and stamina are on the increase. Raking and bagging leaves into 6 lawn bags in one afternoon is a test I pass with flying colors.
What I accomplish in the end isn't as important as my willingness to try. Using my creativity in as many ways as is possible is really the goal here. After that, whatever will be, will be.
Taking a risk isn't half-bad. In fact, it's energizing.
I love life -- don't wish for the alternative.
Almost everybody is kind -- if I give them half a chance.
I feel alive and joyous -- most of the time.
I'm moving up -- to where I don't know.
I'm moving forward, ever forward.
I can't solve all the world's problems -- but I can damn well contribute my 2 cents worth.
When a door opens, I go through it.
I take on too many jobs but I'm convinced that, one of these days, I'll finish them all. Then die.
Life is hard but worth every minute.
I learn something new each day -- what joy!
Hurrah! I volunteer yesterday morning at our annual community clean-up. In the afternoon, I rake around my yard and fill 6 lawn bags of left-over leaves. I work for others, then at home. I give full measure of myself -- it's been a good day. It's spring in Montana!
Within the last several weeks, I settle on two goals for my Democratic campaign -- my low-key, off-the-radar, one-by-one campaign. My first goal is to get out the vote. In doing that, I want to first prepare voters, help them understand any referendum that appears on the ballot. There may be three: one on voting rights (taking away the right to register and vote the same day) and two on health care. One will expand Medicaid and the other will forbid the state from expanding Medicaid and from using funds or staff to administer the Affordable Care Act. The meaning and purpose of both of these must be made abundantly clear. It's been said that the voting rights referendum will be purposely confusing for voters.
My second goal is to focus on women and the impact that policies have on their economic well-being. This includes health-care policies, minimum-wage policies, equal pay for equal work, voting rights, all policies have an effect on women. No matter what others use as talking points, the fact that women are at least half our population means that they must be taken into account when discussing all policies.
Just how I will approach these two goals has yet to be determined. As I move forward, through research, listening and discussing policies with others, a way will become clear. Attending the Billings Chapter of League of Women Voters will supply clarity as well.
One thing I do know. My exercise program of the past two weeks will add strength to reach my goals. Walking every day, as fast as I comfortably can as far as I comfortably can, already makes a difference. Both my energy level and stamina are on the increase. Raking and bagging leaves into 6 lawn bags in one afternoon is a test I pass with flying colors.
What I accomplish in the end isn't as important as my willingness to try. Using my creativity in as many ways as is possible is really the goal here. After that, whatever will be, will be.
Friday, April 25, 2014
Beware of "False" Democrats
In my latest research, I uncover the March 27, 2014, issue of the Helena Independent Record that provides information on Medicaid expansion in Montana. Democratic Gov. Bullock and Lt. Gov. McLean sign a petition to qualify a voter initiative to expand Medicaid. If they garner enough signatures by June 20, the initiative (I-170) will appear on the November ballot. This initiative will "ensure 70,000 low-income Montanans no longer live under the threat of financial collapse or catastrophic illness, simply because they do not have adequate health coverage."
The April 3, 2014, issue of the same newspaper describes a second initiative that prohibits Montana "from using funds or staff to administer the Affordable Care Act and forbidding the state from expanding Medicaid..." This initiative (I-171) also needs to gather enough signatures to appear on the ballot. "It's a dangerous policy because it would eliminate our CHIP (Children's Health Insurance Program) and our Medicaid plan, costing thousands of Montanans the health care they depend on."
Meanwhile a lawsuit challenging the fiscal statement of I-170 is filed with the Supreme Court that later rejects the lawsuit. However, it's the group of three people who file the lawsuit that draws my attention: one Republican, one Democrat, and one MSU student. Wait a minute! A Democrat?! What is a Democrat doing in such a group?! Her name is Kathy Hollenback. The name rings a bell. I wonder if...
I email Lauren Caldwell, MDLCC Director, for a copy of a list she had sent out early in March. There it is: Kathy Hollenback is the last name in a list of 8 Republican Tea Party extremists who are running as "Democrats" in this year's Montana elections. They all file against true Democrats in primaries. The problem is first noticed in Gallatin County, where 5 tea Party extremists file. This same tactic is then seen in both Sanders and Teton Counties. Its purpose? To deceive voters and mislead the public.
The following is the list of 8 Republicans running as "Democrats" in Montana:
In my latest research, I uncover the March 27, 2014, issue of the Helena Independent Record that provides information on Medicaid expansion in Montana. Democratic Gov. Bullock and Lt. Gov. McLean sign a petition to qualify a voter initiative to expand Medicaid. If they garner enough signatures by June 20, the initiative (I-170) will appear on the November ballot. This initiative will "ensure 70,000 low-income Montanans no longer live under the threat of financial collapse or catastrophic illness, simply because they do not have adequate health coverage."
The April 3, 2014, issue of the same newspaper describes a second initiative that prohibits Montana "from using funds or staff to administer the Affordable Care Act and forbidding the state from expanding Medicaid..." This initiative (I-171) also needs to gather enough signatures to appear on the ballot. "It's a dangerous policy because it would eliminate our CHIP (Children's Health Insurance Program) and our Medicaid plan, costing thousands of Montanans the health care they depend on."
Meanwhile a lawsuit challenging the fiscal statement of I-170 is filed with the Supreme Court that later rejects the lawsuit. However, it's the group of three people who file the lawsuit that draws my attention: one Republican, one Democrat, and one MSU student. Wait a minute! A Democrat?! What is a Democrat doing in such a group?! Her name is Kathy Hollenback. The name rings a bell. I wonder if...
I email Lauren Caldwell, MDLCC Director, for a copy of a list she had sent out early in March. There it is: Kathy Hollenback is the last name in a list of 8 Republican Tea Party extremists who are running as "Democrats" in this year's Montana elections. They all file against true Democrats in primaries. The problem is first noticed in Gallatin County, where 5 tea Party extremists file. This same tactic is then seen in both Sanders and Teton Counties. Its purpose? To deceive voters and mislead the public.
The following is the list of 8 Republicans running as "Democrats" in Montana:
- SD09, Choteau-area -- David Brownell -- primary with Joan Graham (bonafide Democrat). Brownell runs as Repulican in 2008 for Pandera County Clerk of District Court. He could not name a Democratic issue he planned to champion (Great Falls Tribune).
- SD32, Bozeman -- Harry Pennington -- primary with Rep. Franke Wilmer (bonafide Democrat). Pennington's Facebook page has "racially-charged blather" and calls for Pres. Obama's impeachment (Montana Cowgirl).
- SD34, Belgrade -- Michael Comstock -- primary with April Bounamici (bonafide Democrat). Comstock is known as a "one-world conspiracy" theorist and "calls himself a 'Tea Party Extremist'" (Montana Cowgirl).
- HD13, Thompson Falls/Trout Creek -- Gerald Joseph Cuvillier -- primary with Weylin Achatz (bonafide Democrat). Cuvillier is "elected in 2011 as Vice-Chair of the Sanders County Republican Central Committee" (Montana Cowgirl).
- HD14, Superior/Plains -- Gerry Caldwell -- primary with Lloyd Wilkins (bonfide Democrat). Caldwell is running as a "conservative Democrat". He could not name a Democratic issue he planned to champion (Great Falls Tribune).
- HD62, Bozeman -- Dane Peeples -- primary with Rep. Tom Woods (bonafide Democrat). Peeples "is part of a local militia group called 'the Irregulars' and has an account on the Tea Party 'Patriot' Bulletin Board called the Constitution Club (Montana Cowgirl).
- HD63, Bozeman -- Laura Springer -- primary with Zach Brown (bonafide Democrat). Springer is an associate of Peeples (Montana Cowgirl).
- HD66, Bozeman -- Kathy Hollenback -- primary with Denise Hayman (bonafide Democrat). Hollenback's filing phone number and address are the same as Gallatin County Republican precinct chairman Dave Ponte (Great Falls Tribune).
Tuesday, April 22, 2014
Out-of-Whack Back? See if this works.
1. Use a yoga mat or blanket. Stretch it out on the floor. No pillows.
2. Sit on the mat and ease your back slowly down to the floor. Rest your head on the mat.
3. Bend your knees up with your feet flat on the floor. Keep them there for the duration of the exercise. Rest your arms along your sides.
4. At first, your back may not feel like it "fits" the floor. Just remain in this position for a while -- 5 minutes maybe. Gradually, you will relax and your body becomes more comfortable.
5. When you're ready, pull your heels close in to your buttocks. Push into the floor at your lower back and begin to lift your buttocks up.
6. At the same time and moving slowly, feel your back come up off the floor, one vertebra at a time. Keep raising your buttocks while also feeling each vertebra rise off the floor.
7. When you get to the neck, hold. Your back should be off the floor and your stomach and thighs as far off the floor as you can get them. Feel the pull in your upper leg muscles.
8. Slowly, begin to lower your back, one vertebra at a time. Bring your back down to the original position. Relax.
9. Follow these same instructions, completing 3-5 times, raising and then lowering your back.
I've observed this exercise as a part of a yoga lesson. I use it every several days. When my back gets tired, or feels like it's out-of-whack, just going through this exercise helps eliminate feelings of back discomfort.
In addition, I periodically take a nap flat on the floor. The position is the same as for this exercise only my knees are resting against each other (a pillow can be placed under the knees also). Whatever crookedness seems to be developing in my posture as I age, this exercise and nap help to straighten me out. I'm reminded to walk head up, shoulders back and belly tucked in. Can't beat that!
1. Use a yoga mat or blanket. Stretch it out on the floor. No pillows.
2. Sit on the mat and ease your back slowly down to the floor. Rest your head on the mat.
3. Bend your knees up with your feet flat on the floor. Keep them there for the duration of the exercise. Rest your arms along your sides.
4. At first, your back may not feel like it "fits" the floor. Just remain in this position for a while -- 5 minutes maybe. Gradually, you will relax and your body becomes more comfortable.
5. When you're ready, pull your heels close in to your buttocks. Push into the floor at your lower back and begin to lift your buttocks up.
6. At the same time and moving slowly, feel your back come up off the floor, one vertebra at a time. Keep raising your buttocks while also feeling each vertebra rise off the floor.
7. When you get to the neck, hold. Your back should be off the floor and your stomach and thighs as far off the floor as you can get them. Feel the pull in your upper leg muscles.
8. Slowly, begin to lower your back, one vertebra at a time. Bring your back down to the original position. Relax.
9. Follow these same instructions, completing 3-5 times, raising and then lowering your back.
I've observed this exercise as a part of a yoga lesson. I use it every several days. When my back gets tired, or feels like it's out-of-whack, just going through this exercise helps eliminate feelings of back discomfort.
In addition, I periodically take a nap flat on the floor. The position is the same as for this exercise only my knees are resting against each other (a pillow can be placed under the knees also). Whatever crookedness seems to be developing in my posture as I age, this exercise and nap help to straighten me out. I'm reminded to walk head up, shoulders back and belly tucked in. Can't beat that!
Sunday, April 20, 2014
Medicaid Expansion? You bet!
The numbers of uninsured in our country are decreasing, thanks to the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare). They are decreasing at a faster rate in states where there has been Medicaid expansion. On average, the rate of the uninsured has dropped by 2.5 percent in states where there is Medicaid expansion but only by .08 percent in states where that expansion has been refused.
Take a look at the 8 million now signing up for Obamacare, particularly those insured for the first time. According to Ezra Klein, these latest figures show the percentage-point change in the insured rate from late 2013 to early 2014 (these are the rates at which people are becoming insured):
By ethnicity:
So why then, with 8 million signing up for Obamacare, do we still have 70,000 Montanans without affordable health care? Yes, most of them could appear in those statistical categories of ethnicity, age, and income presented above. The problem in Montana arises, though, because Republican legislators voted against expanding Medicaid. That means federal subsidies that would have been available through Medicaid (that would allow those earning 100 percent below the poverty level to qualify for subsidies and therefore be able to purchase health care) is not available to Montanans.
Why not?
"A majority of Republicans in the 2013 Montana Legislature...argue it would become too costly for the state and wouldn't improve health in the state," according to the Independent Record of 4/19/2014.
Too costly?
The numbers of uninsured in our country are decreasing, thanks to the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare). They are decreasing at a faster rate in states where there has been Medicaid expansion. On average, the rate of the uninsured has dropped by 2.5 percent in states where there is Medicaid expansion but only by .08 percent in states where that expansion has been refused.
Take a look at the 8 million now signing up for Obamacare, particularly those insured for the first time. According to Ezra Klein, these latest figures show the percentage-point change in the insured rate from late 2013 to early 2014 (these are the rates at which people are becoming insured):
By ethnicity:
- White, non-Hispanic -- 1.9
- Non-white, non-Hispanic -- 3.8
- Hispanic -- 4
- 18-30: 4.3
- 31-49: 1.9
- 50-64; 2.3
- Below 138% of poverty line -- 4.7
- 138-399 of poverty line -- 3.6
- 400% mor more of poverty line -- 0.3
So why then, with 8 million signing up for Obamacare, do we still have 70,000 Montanans without affordable health care? Yes, most of them could appear in those statistical categories of ethnicity, age, and income presented above. The problem in Montana arises, though, because Republican legislators voted against expanding Medicaid. That means federal subsidies that would have been available through Medicaid (that would allow those earning 100 percent below the poverty level to qualify for subsidies and therefore be able to purchase health care) is not available to Montanans.
Why not?
"A majority of Republicans in the 2013 Montana Legislature...argue it would become too costly for the state and wouldn't improve health in the state," according to the Independent Record of 4/19/2014.
Too costly?
- Again, according to Independent Record, "Under the federal Affordable Care Act, the federal government will cover almost the entire cost of expanding Medicaid through 2016. After that, the feds' share of expansion costs will gradually decline to 90 percent by 2020."
- Maybe this is a good time to talk about other federal subsidies in Montana, who receives them and for how much. There is a "large amount of farm subsidies received by more than a dozen lawmakers...33 Montana legislators, 30 of whom are Republicans, benefited from farm program subsidies," reports the Bozeman Daily Chronicle, March 21, 2011. "...lawmakers, their spouses and businesses in which they had interests received a total of $7 million in farm subsidies between 1995 and 2009." One Senator's reasoning? "They [USDA] are for an affordable, safe food supply." This same Senator received $643,000 in farm subsidies since 1995..."
- Is it O.K. for Montana legislators to receive thousands of dollars in farm subsidies in order to create "affordable, safe food supply," but 70,000 Montanans cannot receive federal subsidies that allow them to purchase affordable health care?
- Would the Republican Montana legislators care to rescind their personal health care coverage in order to prove their point? That lack of health care coverage will make no difference in the improvement of their health?
- Poor health as a result of no access to affordable health care can result in poverty. "Poverty is both a cause and a consequence of poor health. Poverty increases the chances of poor health. Poor health in turn traps communities in poverty. Infectious and neglected tropical diseases kill and weaken millions of the poorest and most vulnerable people each year," reports Healthpovertyaction.org.
Friday, April 18, 2014
HOW DID I GET HERE: Forget the Bootstraps!
It's the seventh week now since I file for Democratic candidate for State House in Montana. The fear that has been with me from the beginning is mostly dissipating. Passing time helps. It's also true that, in sharing my candidacy with different community groups of which I'm a member, I'm gaining more confidence. Reactions seem to range from some acceptance to utter surprise to ho-hum. If anything can clarify my importance within the community, it's the "ho-hum, big-deal". It tends to keep me in touch with reality.
At the same time, I realize I'm also looking for affirmation. Is there anyone out there (within my small community) who thinks that what I'm doing is a great idea? When I share my down-in-the-dumps feeling with a local friend through email, she writes back, "I would vote for you. I know you would do the required research." But mostly with those I interact, my candidacy just pointedly does not come up in our conversations.
Leila, a friend from Billings, tries to explain the culture of this area, and Montana in general. She is born here, has lived for some years in California, but is back again in retirement. "People here," she says, "are expected to pull themselves up by their bootstraps. It's when a disaster takes place that neighbors come together to provide support."
Take, for example, Roundup's latest flood. This spring word gets out early as to possible flooding along the Musselshell River. Spring thaws upriver cause water to rise and begin to move downstream. Homes and businesses in low-lying areas prepare by moving equipment to higher ground. Community meetings led by the Department of Emergency Services are held regularly at St. Benedict Catholic Church. Reports are made on where the problems are, what is expected to happen with the fast-running water, and where help is needed. Beds and food are available for anyone who needs them. Even before the flood of 2011 and the fires of 2012, the community has been developing a program and process that jumps into action when disaster warnings come.
Other factors impact culture in the western states, however. The Billings Gazette, Nov. 25, 2012, reports that Montana "has been near the top in the nation in the rate of suicide for 35 years...The victims are military veterans, American Indians, senior citizens, and teenagers."
Suicides in Montana seem to come from not only a "cowboy culture" (pull yourself up by your own bootstraps), but also from the following:
(Billings Gazette, "High-Country Crisis: Montana's suicide rate leads the nation," Nov. 25, 2012)
It's the seventh week now since I file for Democratic candidate for State House in Montana. The fear that has been with me from the beginning is mostly dissipating. Passing time helps. It's also true that, in sharing my candidacy with different community groups of which I'm a member, I'm gaining more confidence. Reactions seem to range from some acceptance to utter surprise to ho-hum. If anything can clarify my importance within the community, it's the "ho-hum, big-deal". It tends to keep me in touch with reality.
At the same time, I realize I'm also looking for affirmation. Is there anyone out there (within my small community) who thinks that what I'm doing is a great idea? When I share my down-in-the-dumps feeling with a local friend through email, she writes back, "I would vote for you. I know you would do the required research." But mostly with those I interact, my candidacy just pointedly does not come up in our conversations.
Leila, a friend from Billings, tries to explain the culture of this area, and Montana in general. She is born here, has lived for some years in California, but is back again in retirement. "People here," she says, "are expected to pull themselves up by their bootstraps. It's when a disaster takes place that neighbors come together to provide support."
Take, for example, Roundup's latest flood. This spring word gets out early as to possible flooding along the Musselshell River. Spring thaws upriver cause water to rise and begin to move downstream. Homes and businesses in low-lying areas prepare by moving equipment to higher ground. Community meetings led by the Department of Emergency Services are held regularly at St. Benedict Catholic Church. Reports are made on where the problems are, what is expected to happen with the fast-running water, and where help is needed. Beds and food are available for anyone who needs them. Even before the flood of 2011 and the fires of 2012, the community has been developing a program and process that jumps into action when disaster warnings come.
Other factors impact culture in the western states, however. The Billings Gazette, Nov. 25, 2012, reports that Montana "has been near the top in the nation in the rate of suicide for 35 years...The victims are military veterans, American Indians, senior citizens, and teenagers."
Suicides in Montana seem to come from not only a "cowboy culture" (pull yourself up by your own bootstraps), but also from the following:
- Montana is a gun state. It is third in the nation for per capita gun possession. "People who live in areas with high concentrations of guns are more likely to die by suicide."
- Social isolation that comes with living in Montana. If there is a network of social support, there is a lower incidence of suicide.
- Widespread use of drugs
- A shortage of mental health professionals in the state
(Billings Gazette, "High-Country Crisis: Montana's suicide rate leads the nation," Nov. 25, 2012)
Wednesday, April 16, 2014
Stressed Out? Go Under!
Getting tensed up? Can't relax? Can't sleep? Try this.
1 -- Sit up in a chair, feet on the floor (or sit up in bed).
2 -- Close your eyes.
3 -- Slowly roll your head around in a circle to the right 3 times. Do the same to the left, signaling to your body that you are beginning to relax.
4 -- Breathe in deeply. Hold to the count of 5. Breathe out slowly through your mouth to the count of 10. Repeat 2 more times.
5 -- Breathe normally, keeping your eyes closed.
6 -- Focus solely on your breath. Keep your attention on your breathing.
7 -- Your mind will wander but, matter-of-factly, always bring it back to your breathing. Your mind will wander again but always come back to your breathing. Over and over.
8 -- Feel your muscles in your feet and legs begin to relax. Breathe. Up through your torso, allow your different organs to relax. Breathe. Your intestines, stomach, heart, lungs. Breathe. Your arms are relaxing with each breath. Your back is relaxing. Up through your neck and head. Breathe.
9 -- Bring your mind always back to breathing.
10 -- Take as long as you can to sit relaxed, loose, focusing on each breath. Bring your mind back to breathing each time it wanders.
11 -- Time may be 10, 15 minutes. 30 minutes. Or more. Within whatever time is available, this process will pull you under.
12 -- Open your eyes. Re-orient yourself to your surroundings.
13 -- Feel relaxed, refreshed. Ready to move on. Or to snuggle back into the covers, and sleep.
This is meditation. This is going under. Whenever stress takes over, take time wherever you are to close your eyes, slowly relax, focus on your breathing. It can work. Let it!
Getting tensed up? Can't relax? Can't sleep? Try this.
1 -- Sit up in a chair, feet on the floor (or sit up in bed).
2 -- Close your eyes.
3 -- Slowly roll your head around in a circle to the right 3 times. Do the same to the left, signaling to your body that you are beginning to relax.
4 -- Breathe in deeply. Hold to the count of 5. Breathe out slowly through your mouth to the count of 10. Repeat 2 more times.
5 -- Breathe normally, keeping your eyes closed.
6 -- Focus solely on your breath. Keep your attention on your breathing.
7 -- Your mind will wander but, matter-of-factly, always bring it back to your breathing. Your mind will wander again but always come back to your breathing. Over and over.
8 -- Feel your muscles in your feet and legs begin to relax. Breathe. Up through your torso, allow your different organs to relax. Breathe. Your intestines, stomach, heart, lungs. Breathe. Your arms are relaxing with each breath. Your back is relaxing. Up through your neck and head. Breathe.
9 -- Bring your mind always back to breathing.
10 -- Take as long as you can to sit relaxed, loose, focusing on each breath. Bring your mind back to breathing each time it wanders.
11 -- Time may be 10, 15 minutes. 30 minutes. Or more. Within whatever time is available, this process will pull you under.
12 -- Open your eyes. Re-orient yourself to your surroundings.
13 -- Feel relaxed, refreshed. Ready to move on. Or to snuggle back into the covers, and sleep.
This is meditation. This is going under. Whenever stress takes over, take time wherever you are to close your eyes, slowly relax, focus on your breathing. It can work. Let it!
Monday, April 14, 2014
Suppressing Voting Rights in Montana
As in other red states where there is a Republican majority in the legislature, Montana is at risk of losing voting rights. Suppression of the vote is a major Republican thrust throughout red states and Montana seems to be following suit.
Since 2005, Montanans have had the right to register to vote on election day. Same-day registration boosts participation in elections. It allows college students, who tend to move more frequently, to vote. It eases unnecessary burdens for blacks, for Hispanics, and for young voters, particularly those from under-privileged backgrounds.
Current same-day registration laws in Montana are already restrictive. They require that voter registration take place only at county election offices, not at polling sites. To follow the law, voters must drive to two different locations to vote on Election Day.
In their last session, the state legislature determined to defeat same-day registration. Other than the fact that affected populations tend to vote Democratic, there is no reason for removing this right. There is almost no in-person voter fraud found in the state. For what reason, other than suppressing votes, does the legislature want to remove this right?
Knowing that our Democratic Governor Bullock would veto it, the legislature has decided to take elimination of this right to voters. It will be a referendum on the November ballot this year, #126. My friend, Leila, reports that the actual ballot language is confusing, however. "The wording is deliberately difficult in hopes that it will pass and people won't understand it," she tells me. More information on this specific referendum will be forthcoming in early June when the Billings Chapter of the League of Women Voters will be discussing it (navigating the Montana Government website is all but impossible).
This referendum needs to be defeated. (1) It rescinds a right we currently have -- to register and vote the same day. (2) It makes voting more difficult. Voting is a right for all citizens, no matter their situation. Access to that right should be helped, not hindered.
How do we respond? (1) Take every opportunity to notify/educate voters about this move of the Montana Legislature. As soon as the specific language of the referendum is known, provide a clear explanation to voters, making sure they understand what a "yes"or "no" vote means. (2) Get out the vote. Begin a campaign early on to encourage all voters to practice their right to vote. Our legislators are our representatives; we must tell them what we want.
This is the beginning of an "Educate to Motivate" campaign in Montana. Let's get started!
("Montana GOP looks to end same-day voter registration" by Zachary Roth)
As in other red states where there is a Republican majority in the legislature, Montana is at risk of losing voting rights. Suppression of the vote is a major Republican thrust throughout red states and Montana seems to be following suit.
Since 2005, Montanans have had the right to register to vote on election day. Same-day registration boosts participation in elections. It allows college students, who tend to move more frequently, to vote. It eases unnecessary burdens for blacks, for Hispanics, and for young voters, particularly those from under-privileged backgrounds.
Current same-day registration laws in Montana are already restrictive. They require that voter registration take place only at county election offices, not at polling sites. To follow the law, voters must drive to two different locations to vote on Election Day.
In their last session, the state legislature determined to defeat same-day registration. Other than the fact that affected populations tend to vote Democratic, there is no reason for removing this right. There is almost no in-person voter fraud found in the state. For what reason, other than suppressing votes, does the legislature want to remove this right?
Knowing that our Democratic Governor Bullock would veto it, the legislature has decided to take elimination of this right to voters. It will be a referendum on the November ballot this year, #126. My friend, Leila, reports that the actual ballot language is confusing, however. "The wording is deliberately difficult in hopes that it will pass and people won't understand it," she tells me. More information on this specific referendum will be forthcoming in early June when the Billings Chapter of the League of Women Voters will be discussing it (navigating the Montana Government website is all but impossible).
This referendum needs to be defeated. (1) It rescinds a right we currently have -- to register and vote the same day. (2) It makes voting more difficult. Voting is a right for all citizens, no matter their situation. Access to that right should be helped, not hindered.
How do we respond? (1) Take every opportunity to notify/educate voters about this move of the Montana Legislature. As soon as the specific language of the referendum is known, provide a clear explanation to voters, making sure they understand what a "yes"or "no" vote means. (2) Get out the vote. Begin a campaign early on to encourage all voters to practice their right to vote. Our legislators are our representatives; we must tell them what we want.
This is the beginning of an "Educate to Motivate" campaign in Montana. Let's get started!
("Montana GOP looks to end same-day voter registration" by Zachary Roth)
Saturday, April 12, 2014
HOW DID I GET HERE -- Effects of Fear
It is now late into the third week after my filing for the Montana State House as a Democratic candidate. I have blown hot and cold at the thought of taking on this experience: running blue in a red state. Even during my March 3rd phone call with Matt, Democratic Field Director, my fear is palpable. In answer to his request of including my name on the November ballot, I respond, "You don't think I'll find a burning cross on my lawn some night?" He reassures me, because of where I live, that probably wouldn't happen.
On Sunday, at the beginning of this third week, I tell of my candidacy and share my fears with the UU Fellowship in Billings. They are supportive and encouraging. But I have yet to tell the first person in my town. Earlier in the week, I write several posts for my new blog. Since only a few know of the blog, there's little likelihood there would be a local response to anything I've written so far. Still, I worry about reactions from crazy people -- and lay low. In fact, in the previous week, a small circle of friends meets at my house. We each have a goal in mind when it comes to writing and we meet to provide ideas and support in that process. I do not mention the blog that might give away my secret.
It's only after a conversation that lends itself to my situation that I share with a Roundup citizen -- almost four weeks after I file. We are discussing an upcoming Trade Fair where local citizens running for local offices will have an opportunity to introduce themselves to Fair participants. There will be a table available for their literature as well. "Maybe I should introduce myself, too," I suggest. I go on to explain. She doesn't seem upset, only shows surprise because she hasn't yet heard anything about it. I laugh, "There's probably a good reason for that since you're the first person I've told here." At the Fair, the table for candidates will focus on their running for local offices; my candidacy is for a statewide office. I decline the idea of participating. I'm nervous about putting myself out there so quickly and publicly.
Midweek, our small circle of friends meets again at another member's home. This time I have the courage to mention my candidacy. The question that surprises me most is, "What if you win?" I laugh and tell them the story of my husband's experience in running for office in South Florida in the 1970's. "If I win," he said at the time, "I'm going to demand a recount!" This whole experience is beginning to feel like a game now.
The next week, I share my not-so-secret again with a larger community group. "I want to introduce you to someone," I say to the group after the meeting is adjourned, "who is a Democrat running for State House representing District 40." I pause. "And she is me," I finish.
"You?!" is the loudest response. She follows up with question concerning campaigning. I surprise myself in answering her, "I don't want to work that hard." Another mentions, "Oh, I'm neither Republican or Democrat."
My tension is beginning to ease a little. Maybe paralyzing fear has been unwarranted, I tell myself. With each step I've taken in sharing my candidacy, my fears have lessened. Maybe that's the secret, I tell myself. Honor my commitment first. Then, just continue what I've already started: take one step at a time, one day at a time. And trust the process.
It is now late into the third week after my filing for the Montana State House as a Democratic candidate. I have blown hot and cold at the thought of taking on this experience: running blue in a red state. Even during my March 3rd phone call with Matt, Democratic Field Director, my fear is palpable. In answer to his request of including my name on the November ballot, I respond, "You don't think I'll find a burning cross on my lawn some night?" He reassures me, because of where I live, that probably wouldn't happen.
On Sunday, at the beginning of this third week, I tell of my candidacy and share my fears with the UU Fellowship in Billings. They are supportive and encouraging. But I have yet to tell the first person in my town. Earlier in the week, I write several posts for my new blog. Since only a few know of the blog, there's little likelihood there would be a local response to anything I've written so far. Still, I worry about reactions from crazy people -- and lay low. In fact, in the previous week, a small circle of friends meets at my house. We each have a goal in mind when it comes to writing and we meet to provide ideas and support in that process. I do not mention the blog that might give away my secret.
It's only after a conversation that lends itself to my situation that I share with a Roundup citizen -- almost four weeks after I file. We are discussing an upcoming Trade Fair where local citizens running for local offices will have an opportunity to introduce themselves to Fair participants. There will be a table available for their literature as well. "Maybe I should introduce myself, too," I suggest. I go on to explain. She doesn't seem upset, only shows surprise because she hasn't yet heard anything about it. I laugh, "There's probably a good reason for that since you're the first person I've told here." At the Fair, the table for candidates will focus on their running for local offices; my candidacy is for a statewide office. I decline the idea of participating. I'm nervous about putting myself out there so quickly and publicly.
Midweek, our small circle of friends meets again at another member's home. This time I have the courage to mention my candidacy. The question that surprises me most is, "What if you win?" I laugh and tell them the story of my husband's experience in running for office in South Florida in the 1970's. "If I win," he said at the time, "I'm going to demand a recount!" This whole experience is beginning to feel like a game now.
The next week, I share my not-so-secret again with a larger community group. "I want to introduce you to someone," I say to the group after the meeting is adjourned, "who is a Democrat running for State House representing District 40." I pause. "And she is me," I finish.
"You?!" is the loudest response. She follows up with question concerning campaigning. I surprise myself in answering her, "I don't want to work that hard." Another mentions, "Oh, I'm neither Republican or Democrat."
My tension is beginning to ease a little. Maybe paralyzing fear has been unwarranted, I tell myself. With each step I've taken in sharing my candidacy, my fears have lessened. Maybe that's the secret, I tell myself. Honor my commitment first. Then, just continue what I've already started: take one step at a time, one day at a time. And trust the process.
Friday, April 11, 2014
How to Exercise -- for a campaign or a regular work day
Keep your mind clear and your body flexible. Follow these 10 early-morning stretches to wake you up and keep your motor running throughout the day. From head to toe, you will be ready for anything.
1. Head rolls: Do 10 head rolls (rolling from right shoulder around to the back to the left, to the front and back to the right). Do 10 head rolls to the left. Move more slowly as needed.
2. Shoulder rolls: Hunch and roll your shoulders backwards 10 times. Hunch them forward 10 times.
3. Large arm swings: Swing your right arm in a circle beginning with your arm at your side, swing forward, up, back then down. Do this 10 times. Do the same with your left arm. Then swing both arms together, first forward 10 times crossing them in the front, then backwards 10 times.
4. Tight arm swings: Stretch your arms straight out at the sides. Keeping them straight, rotate them in a tight circle 10 times forward, then 10 times backwards. Continue these complete rotations 5 times.
5. Side stretches: Place your left arm at your side. Bring your right arm over your head. At each count to three, bend, straighten, bend then straighten. Your left arm will move further down your side. Continue 10 times. Do the same with your right arm at your side and the left arm over your head, 10 times.
6. Belly-dancing rolls: Place hands on your hips. Bring hips forward, roll them to the right, around to the back, over to the left and forward again. Continue 10 times. Do the same but beginning to the left. The goal is to flex your body at the waist while keeping legs slightly bent.
7. Touching toes: Stretch legs apart, keeping them straight at the knee. Reach to the floor, bending as far as is comfortable. Each time you bend, your arms and back will stretch further. Do this 10 times.
8. Body twists: Keeping your legs apart after previous exercise, spread both arms out at the sides, and swing your body left then right, turning at the waist. Keep your legs straight with head facing forward. Do this 10 times.
9. Leg exercise #1: Lean against a wall. Bring your right leg up to your chest, use arms to pull it into your chest and hold for several seconds. Do this 10 times. Repeat with your left leg.
10. Leg exercise #2: Stand with legs together. Take one step forward with right foot. While keeping left heel on the floor, lean into that right leg bending it downward at the knee. Feel the stretch in your left leg. Hold. Bring your right leg back to original position and repeat 10 times. Do the same starting with your left leg.
Follow this routine each morning. These stretches demand about 15 minutes out of your day but very quickly can become one of the most satisfying activities you can give yourself. Have a good day!
Keep your mind clear and your body flexible. Follow these 10 early-morning stretches to wake you up and keep your motor running throughout the day. From head to toe, you will be ready for anything.
1. Head rolls: Do 10 head rolls (rolling from right shoulder around to the back to the left, to the front and back to the right). Do 10 head rolls to the left. Move more slowly as needed.
2. Shoulder rolls: Hunch and roll your shoulders backwards 10 times. Hunch them forward 10 times.
3. Large arm swings: Swing your right arm in a circle beginning with your arm at your side, swing forward, up, back then down. Do this 10 times. Do the same with your left arm. Then swing both arms together, first forward 10 times crossing them in the front, then backwards 10 times.
4. Tight arm swings: Stretch your arms straight out at the sides. Keeping them straight, rotate them in a tight circle 10 times forward, then 10 times backwards. Continue these complete rotations 5 times.
5. Side stretches: Place your left arm at your side. Bring your right arm over your head. At each count to three, bend, straighten, bend then straighten. Your left arm will move further down your side. Continue 10 times. Do the same with your right arm at your side and the left arm over your head, 10 times.
6. Belly-dancing rolls: Place hands on your hips. Bring hips forward, roll them to the right, around to the back, over to the left and forward again. Continue 10 times. Do the same but beginning to the left. The goal is to flex your body at the waist while keeping legs slightly bent.
7. Touching toes: Stretch legs apart, keeping them straight at the knee. Reach to the floor, bending as far as is comfortable. Each time you bend, your arms and back will stretch further. Do this 10 times.
8. Body twists: Keeping your legs apart after previous exercise, spread both arms out at the sides, and swing your body left then right, turning at the waist. Keep your legs straight with head facing forward. Do this 10 times.
9. Leg exercise #1: Lean against a wall. Bring your right leg up to your chest, use arms to pull it into your chest and hold for several seconds. Do this 10 times. Repeat with your left leg.
10. Leg exercise #2: Stand with legs together. Take one step forward with right foot. While keeping left heel on the floor, lean into that right leg bending it downward at the knee. Feel the stretch in your left leg. Hold. Bring your right leg back to original position and repeat 10 times. Do the same starting with your left leg.
Follow this routine each morning. These stretches demand about 15 minutes out of your day but very quickly can become one of the most satisfying activities you can give yourself. Have a good day!
Wednesday, April 9, 2014
The Affordable Care Act and Abortion
Understandably, there are many mistakes, misconceptions, and just plain confusion concerning the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare). This has also been the case in the past when, for example, another big law, Medicare part D, was introduced during the George W. Bush administration. Although Democrats had many questions about the prescription drug benefit, they eventually supported it and actively encouraged constituents to apply for the benefit.
This has not been the case with the other side of the aisle when it comes to the Affordable Care Act. Purposeful confusion, misconceptions and downright lies from the Republicans have exacerbated what can already be a confusing law for many. Rather than clarify misunderstandings about the Affordable Care Act, Republicans in turn have done everything in their power to sabotage the law -- a law that can bring health care benefits to many who, up until now, have been unable to afford such coverage. Note the efforts of the House Republican caucus to repeal the law at least 50 times!
Thus, we have health care issues that have been totally misrepresented as they pertain to the Affordable Care Act. Take abortion, for example. The Affordable Care Act does nothing "to restrict or expand existing abortion law, while ensuring that federal funds cannot be used for abortion coverage or care." Specifically, the following is true:
"-Health plans cannot be required to cover abortion
-No federal funds for abortion coverage or abortion care
-No federal funds for abortion coverage in the community health insurance option
-Enrollees are guaranteed access to varied coverage in the exchanges
-No preemption of state or federal laws regarding abortion
-Conscience protections for providers and facilities"
(from www.dpc.senate.gov/healthreformbill/healthbill18.pdf)
This is not to say that I agree with the exceptions created for the health care procedure of abortion in the Affordable Care Act. To wit:
1. Whatever must be decided about a woman's pregnancy is between herself and her doctor. It has been said, "If men could get pregnant, abortion would be a sacrament." Until the time when men can get pregnant, it is the woman who gets to make the decision about what happens with her body and her pregnancy. Whether or not that decision includes an abortion is up to the woman. Everyone else, keep your hands off!
2. An abortion is a medical procedure that very few, if any, women who, growing up, would wish to have done. The reason for that is not because it isn't a safe procedure. Within Planned Parenthood, for example, abortion is a safe and effective medical procedure. The emotional toll can be almost overwhelming but, in clinics like Planned Parenthood, all aspects of a woman's health can be addressed.
3. If women would prefer not to go through an abortion and men would prefer women not have to go through an abortion, then towards that end, some actions can be taken. The following are examples:
MEN
a. Educate yourself concerning the reproductive system within your own body and in that of your sexual partner. The more you know about how the systems work, the better able you will be to prevent an unwanted pregnancy before it develops.
b. If you are sexually active, get a vasectomy. It is a quick operation performed under local anesthesia. At the very least, use a contraceptive. (A male latex condom has the highest rate of effectiveness for a contraceptive, male or female, at 86%.)
c. Do whatever you can to make sure your sexual partners have access to birth control.
d. Support those organizations that can provide access to safe birth control. One example of such an organization includes Planned Parenthood. Make every effort to be sure their doors stay open, that they are easily accessible, and that they are free from harassment of those who use their services. Planned Parenthood also provides sexual health services for men as well as women.
WOMEN
a. Do all in your power to keep yourself safe -- as much as is in your control. For example, know how much alcohol you can drink and still keep yourself safe.
b. Use contraceptives if you are sexually active. (About 85% of sexually active women who do not use contraceptives become pregnant within a year.) Consult with health clinics, such as Planned Parenthood, for a program of birth control. Some contraceptives are more effective than others. Demand that your sexual partner use birth control.
c. Aside from contraceptives, abstaining totally from any sexual activity is the only other way to prevent unwanted pregnancies.
d. Be assertive, aggressive in your right to say no to any unwanted sexual advances.
e. Protect yourself through learning as much about your health and reproductive system as you can. The more you know, the better equipped you will be to prevent unwanted pregnancies.
If, in the end, the goal is to do away with abortions, then the practical thing to do is to prevent unwanted pregnancies. Not all abortions can be prevented, like those that are needed because of rape or incest or because the pregnant woman and her doctor decide it is best for her health. But the numbers can be reduced if men, as well as women, take responsibility for that prevention.
If we say that the reason we want to do away with abortions is a concern for life, then let's take a look. Where is the concern for life when food for children in the SNAP program (food stamps) is reduced by billions in a Farm Bill? Where is the concern for life when unemployment checks for families including children are discontinued? Where is the concern for life when governmental programs that provide a safety net for families and children are continually assailed by Republicans? No one can know for certain when life begins but we do know when children are hungry. Walk the walk and forget the talk.
Understandably, there are many mistakes, misconceptions, and just plain confusion concerning the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare). This has also been the case in the past when, for example, another big law, Medicare part D, was introduced during the George W. Bush administration. Although Democrats had many questions about the prescription drug benefit, they eventually supported it and actively encouraged constituents to apply for the benefit.
This has not been the case with the other side of the aisle when it comes to the Affordable Care Act. Purposeful confusion, misconceptions and downright lies from the Republicans have exacerbated what can already be a confusing law for many. Rather than clarify misunderstandings about the Affordable Care Act, Republicans in turn have done everything in their power to sabotage the law -- a law that can bring health care benefits to many who, up until now, have been unable to afford such coverage. Note the efforts of the House Republican caucus to repeal the law at least 50 times!
Thus, we have health care issues that have been totally misrepresented as they pertain to the Affordable Care Act. Take abortion, for example. The Affordable Care Act does nothing "to restrict or expand existing abortion law, while ensuring that federal funds cannot be used for abortion coverage or care." Specifically, the following is true:
"-Health plans cannot be required to cover abortion
-No federal funds for abortion coverage or abortion care
-No federal funds for abortion coverage in the community health insurance option
-Enrollees are guaranteed access to varied coverage in the exchanges
-No preemption of state or federal laws regarding abortion
-Conscience protections for providers and facilities"
(from www.dpc.senate.gov/healthreformbill/healthbill18.pdf)
This is not to say that I agree with the exceptions created for the health care procedure of abortion in the Affordable Care Act. To wit:
1. Whatever must be decided about a woman's pregnancy is between herself and her doctor. It has been said, "If men could get pregnant, abortion would be a sacrament." Until the time when men can get pregnant, it is the woman who gets to make the decision about what happens with her body and her pregnancy. Whether or not that decision includes an abortion is up to the woman. Everyone else, keep your hands off!
2. An abortion is a medical procedure that very few, if any, women who, growing up, would wish to have done. The reason for that is not because it isn't a safe procedure. Within Planned Parenthood, for example, abortion is a safe and effective medical procedure. The emotional toll can be almost overwhelming but, in clinics like Planned Parenthood, all aspects of a woman's health can be addressed.
3. If women would prefer not to go through an abortion and men would prefer women not have to go through an abortion, then towards that end, some actions can be taken. The following are examples:
MEN
a. Educate yourself concerning the reproductive system within your own body and in that of your sexual partner. The more you know about how the systems work, the better able you will be to prevent an unwanted pregnancy before it develops.
b. If you are sexually active, get a vasectomy. It is a quick operation performed under local anesthesia. At the very least, use a contraceptive. (A male latex condom has the highest rate of effectiveness for a contraceptive, male or female, at 86%.)
c. Do whatever you can to make sure your sexual partners have access to birth control.
d. Support those organizations that can provide access to safe birth control. One example of such an organization includes Planned Parenthood. Make every effort to be sure their doors stay open, that they are easily accessible, and that they are free from harassment of those who use their services. Planned Parenthood also provides sexual health services for men as well as women.
WOMEN
a. Do all in your power to keep yourself safe -- as much as is in your control. For example, know how much alcohol you can drink and still keep yourself safe.
b. Use contraceptives if you are sexually active. (About 85% of sexually active women who do not use contraceptives become pregnant within a year.) Consult with health clinics, such as Planned Parenthood, for a program of birth control. Some contraceptives are more effective than others. Demand that your sexual partner use birth control.
c. Aside from contraceptives, abstaining totally from any sexual activity is the only other way to prevent unwanted pregnancies.
d. Be assertive, aggressive in your right to say no to any unwanted sexual advances.
e. Protect yourself through learning as much about your health and reproductive system as you can. The more you know, the better equipped you will be to prevent unwanted pregnancies.
If, in the end, the goal is to do away with abortions, then the practical thing to do is to prevent unwanted pregnancies. Not all abortions can be prevented, like those that are needed because of rape or incest or because the pregnant woman and her doctor decide it is best for her health. But the numbers can be reduced if men, as well as women, take responsibility for that prevention.
If we say that the reason we want to do away with abortions is a concern for life, then let's take a look. Where is the concern for life when food for children in the SNAP program (food stamps) is reduced by billions in a Farm Bill? Where is the concern for life when unemployment checks for families including children are discontinued? Where is the concern for life when governmental programs that provide a safety net for families and children are continually assailed by Republicans? No one can know for certain when life begins but we do know when children are hungry. Walk the walk and forget the talk.
Monday, April 7, 2014
HOW DID I GET HERE: Let the Barrage Begin
It's mid-March, about two weeks since I filed as Democratic candidate for State House for District #40 in Montana. I've made the decision not to withdraw but to continue in this experience through the election in November. It is obvious, however, that official word has gotten out about my candidacy. This has not yet occurred in my town, however -- it's still quiet here. But there is now an official listing on the web of political candidates who have filed throughout the State.
How do I know this? A barrage of emails, snail mail, and surveys have reached my door, but mostly email. I did not realize how many demands would be made of a candidate the minute they file.
There are instructions from the Secretary of State about reports and deadlines that must be met throughout the campaign. From the statewide Democratic office, come guidance and ideas which can be helpful. Suggestions like ten tips for running a campaign I find useful. Other services, such as learning more about the voters in my District, are available if I'm willing to pay for them.
There are surveys that arrive, one after the other, via either email or snail mail. Besides the Montana Family Institute, there is a survey from Conservation Voters concerned about the water in Montana, from Planned Parenthood, from a gun-owners and hunters group, from Carol's List which is a group of women in political office who help other women candidates, from National Rifle Assoc., from NARAL which is a grass-roots pro-choice organization dedicated to protecting reproductive rights, from a group that calls itself Montana Campaign for Liberty, and from the Nat'l Assoc for Gun Rights with a return address of Fredericksburg, Virginia. If I answer the surveys, I will be considered for endorsement as a candidate from those organizations. The only organizations whose surveys I would even contemplate are Conservation Voters, Planned Parenthood, NARAL, and possibly Carol's List. The remainder are all right-wing based.
Invitations arrive. There is a reception sponsored by Billings Assoc., of Realtors. There is a request to attend a Legislative Health Policy Discussion sponsored by four healthcare organizations in Billings. There is a letter from the Montana Historical Society offering a tour of their Museum and Research Center along with a "behind the scenes" at the State Archives and Montana's Museum collections.
Ads appear, mainly through snail mail, for campaign paraphernalia that can be purchased: yard signs, door hangars, banners, brochures, stickers, buttons, key tags, postcards, business cards, etc., etc.
I am overwhelmed.
I review my campaign strategy. I understand now what is normally expected from a candidate running for office; it is represented in all that mail. But I determine to follow my own plan, a suggestion first made to me when it was requested that I put my name on the November ballot.
I put the barrage behind me. Instead, I focus on my campaign strategy of researching, writing, and answering questions. I can attack all three by creating a blog on the internet. But how do I create a blog? I know what a blog is and, years ago, even had one set up by my husband. But this time, I must do it myself.
YouTube is my teacher. I study several different YouTube videos on Friday, begin a blog tentatively on Saturday morning and have a basic blog completed by evening. Nagging questions about details are answered for me the next day by Sue, an expert in social media, at our UU congregation meeting. I also make a Tuesday appointment with a local teacher, Megan, who is knowledgeable. By Monday morning, though, I'm raring to go. I take the chance it will work, and publish my first post on my blog. It goes out through Facebook, my Twitter account and Google+. Megan takes a look and gives me high praise.
What results is another barrage but this time, it is entirely welcome. Emails/Facebook messages from friends and some family members stream in. Some remind me of the Rosie the Riveter poster from WWII: "You can do it!" I'm off and running.
It's mid-March, about two weeks since I filed as Democratic candidate for State House for District #40 in Montana. I've made the decision not to withdraw but to continue in this experience through the election in November. It is obvious, however, that official word has gotten out about my candidacy. This has not yet occurred in my town, however -- it's still quiet here. But there is now an official listing on the web of political candidates who have filed throughout the State.
How do I know this? A barrage of emails, snail mail, and surveys have reached my door, but mostly email. I did not realize how many demands would be made of a candidate the minute they file.
There are instructions from the Secretary of State about reports and deadlines that must be met throughout the campaign. From the statewide Democratic office, come guidance and ideas which can be helpful. Suggestions like ten tips for running a campaign I find useful. Other services, such as learning more about the voters in my District, are available if I'm willing to pay for them.
There are surveys that arrive, one after the other, via either email or snail mail. Besides the Montana Family Institute, there is a survey from Conservation Voters concerned about the water in Montana, from Planned Parenthood, from a gun-owners and hunters group, from Carol's List which is a group of women in political office who help other women candidates, from National Rifle Assoc., from NARAL which is a grass-roots pro-choice organization dedicated to protecting reproductive rights, from a group that calls itself Montana Campaign for Liberty, and from the Nat'l Assoc for Gun Rights with a return address of Fredericksburg, Virginia. If I answer the surveys, I will be considered for endorsement as a candidate from those organizations. The only organizations whose surveys I would even contemplate are Conservation Voters, Planned Parenthood, NARAL, and possibly Carol's List. The remainder are all right-wing based.
Invitations arrive. There is a reception sponsored by Billings Assoc., of Realtors. There is a request to attend a Legislative Health Policy Discussion sponsored by four healthcare organizations in Billings. There is a letter from the Montana Historical Society offering a tour of their Museum and Research Center along with a "behind the scenes" at the State Archives and Montana's Museum collections.
Ads appear, mainly through snail mail, for campaign paraphernalia that can be purchased: yard signs, door hangars, banners, brochures, stickers, buttons, key tags, postcards, business cards, etc., etc.
I am overwhelmed.
I review my campaign strategy. I understand now what is normally expected from a candidate running for office; it is represented in all that mail. But I determine to follow my own plan, a suggestion first made to me when it was requested that I put my name on the November ballot.
I put the barrage behind me. Instead, I focus on my campaign strategy of researching, writing, and answering questions. I can attack all three by creating a blog on the internet. But how do I create a blog? I know what a blog is and, years ago, even had one set up by my husband. But this time, I must do it myself.
YouTube is my teacher. I study several different YouTube videos on Friday, begin a blog tentatively on Saturday morning and have a basic blog completed by evening. Nagging questions about details are answered for me the next day by Sue, an expert in social media, at our UU congregation meeting. I also make a Tuesday appointment with a local teacher, Megan, who is knowledgeable. By Monday morning, though, I'm raring to go. I take the chance it will work, and publish my first post on my blog. It goes out through Facebook, my Twitter account and Google+. Megan takes a look and gives me high praise.
What results is another barrage but this time, it is entirely welcome. Emails/Facebook messages from friends and some family members stream in. Some remind me of the Rosie the Riveter poster from WWII: "You can do it!" I'm off and running.
Friday, April 4, 2014
A SCHOOL ISSUE
I open my newspaper today, April 2, and find a very attractive picture of Central School. That is the name of the elementary school in the town of Roundup where I live, population 1,800. Only this picture is not one I recognize. In fact, I read that it is an artist's rendition of what the School could look like if it were "repurposed."
Roundup is a small, old-wild-west town located in the south central part of Montana. Since its inception, Roundup citizens have committed themselves to providing for the education of those students living within Musselshell Valley. The first school's location is probably in Old Roundup, south of Musselshell River and near the mouth of Half Breed Creek where the McMillan cabin could be found. Mrs. James McMillan is the first teacher and begins classes in her cabin in 1882 without remuneration. She has 13 pupils. Throughout Musselshell County, 66 country schools will eventually come and go.
With the discovery of coal and the coming of the Milwaukee Railroad, the town moves to the north side of Musselshell River and takes the name of Roundup, changing the original village to Old Roundup. In 1908 with miners' families arriving in this fledgling town, a one-room public school is constructed on the northeast corner of Second Street West and Second Avenue. A year later in 1909, with the increasing population, a two-story, four-room wood building is constructed on the site now of Central School, just four blocks north and on the same street as the original school.
In 1911, the wood building is moved and replaced by the present-day stone structure. The west side of it is built in 1911 and the east side in 1912, doubling its size. This is the Central School, with additional modular rooms, that can be found in the center of town today. This is the structure that could be "repurposed."
There have been attempts in the past to raise money for a new school building on the edge of town but all three school bond elections have failed. It's been difficult for long-time residents to think their school might no longer be Central. Decision-making is stalled.
Until now, that is. Under the leadership of community leader, Bill Milton, a group made up of ranchers, business people, senior citizens, school officials and others have been meeting for more than a year. Architects, strutural engineers, citizens, school personnel, and even support and advice from the Montana Historical Preservation office have all been involved in discussions. Past rejections, future projections, community priorities have been reviewed. It is confirmed that Central School is fully suitable for long-term use as a school. In the next few months, the School Board will be making a comparison in cost between building a new school and repurposing the old one and making a decision. In the meanwhile, the community is requested to let the School Board know what they think.
This process of involving community so deeply in a decision about the future of the school is a win-win. It is reminiscent of the early days when residents pull together to provide education to all students, no matter what it takes. Whatever the final decision, it will be the right one.
(Source: Roundup Record-Tribune, April 2, 2014)
I open my newspaper today, April 2, and find a very attractive picture of Central School. That is the name of the elementary school in the town of Roundup where I live, population 1,800. Only this picture is not one I recognize. In fact, I read that it is an artist's rendition of what the School could look like if it were "repurposed."
Roundup is a small, old-wild-west town located in the south central part of Montana. Since its inception, Roundup citizens have committed themselves to providing for the education of those students living within Musselshell Valley. The first school's location is probably in Old Roundup, south of Musselshell River and near the mouth of Half Breed Creek where the McMillan cabin could be found. Mrs. James McMillan is the first teacher and begins classes in her cabin in 1882 without remuneration. She has 13 pupils. Throughout Musselshell County, 66 country schools will eventually come and go.
With the discovery of coal and the coming of the Milwaukee Railroad, the town moves to the north side of Musselshell River and takes the name of Roundup, changing the original village to Old Roundup. In 1908 with miners' families arriving in this fledgling town, a one-room public school is constructed on the northeast corner of Second Street West and Second Avenue. A year later in 1909, with the increasing population, a two-story, four-room wood building is constructed on the site now of Central School, just four blocks north and on the same street as the original school.
In 1911, the wood building is moved and replaced by the present-day stone structure. The west side of it is built in 1911 and the east side in 1912, doubling its size. This is the Central School, with additional modular rooms, that can be found in the center of town today. This is the structure that could be "repurposed."
There have been attempts in the past to raise money for a new school building on the edge of town but all three school bond elections have failed. It's been difficult for long-time residents to think their school might no longer be Central. Decision-making is stalled.
Until now, that is. Under the leadership of community leader, Bill Milton, a group made up of ranchers, business people, senior citizens, school officials and others have been meeting for more than a year. Architects, strutural engineers, citizens, school personnel, and even support and advice from the Montana Historical Preservation office have all been involved in discussions. Past rejections, future projections, community priorities have been reviewed. It is confirmed that Central School is fully suitable for long-term use as a school. In the next few months, the School Board will be making a comparison in cost between building a new school and repurposing the old one and making a decision. In the meanwhile, the community is requested to let the School Board know what they think.
This process of involving community so deeply in a decision about the future of the school is a win-win. It is reminiscent of the early days when residents pull together to provide education to all students, no matter what it takes. Whatever the final decision, it will be the right one.
(Source: Roundup Record-Tribune, April 2, 2014)
Tuesday, April 1, 2014
A PRAYER
There has been a law created, Oh Diety, called the Affordable Care Act. This law creates a Health Insurance Marketplace, a new way for individuals, families and small businesses to get health coverage. It helps uninsured people find health coverage. We beseech you, Oh Diety, to lend a helping hand in making sure all of our citizens receive this benefit.
NO!
It requires insurance companies to cover people with pre-existing health conditions. Our insurance company can't turn us down or charge us more because of our pre-existing health or medical condition like asthma, back pain, diabetes, or cancer.
NO!
It helps us understand the coverage we are getting. We have the right to get an easy-to-understand summary about a health plan's benefits and coverage.
NO!
It holds insurance companies accountable for rate increases. They are generally required to follow the 80/20 rule: to spend at least 80% of the money they take in on premiums on our health care and quality improvement activities, instead of administrative, overhead, and marketing costs.
NO!
It makes it illegal for health insurance companies to arbitrarily cancel our health insurance just because we got sick. The health care law stops insurance companies from canceling our coverage just because we made a mistake on our insurance application.
NO!
It protects our choice of doctors, covers young adults under 26, and provides free preventive care. We can choose any available primary care provider in our insurance plan's network. We may be able to get insured under our parent's plan if we're under 26 ears old. And there are many health plans that are required to cover certain preventive care services at no cost to us.
NO!
It ends lifetime and yearly dollar limits on coverage of essential health benefits. Insurance companies can't set a dollar limit on what they spend on essential health benefits for our care during the entire time we're enrolled in that plan.
NO! NO! NO!
Wait a minute. You aren't the Diety to whom we always pray. Who are you anyway? Who, did you say? John Boehner?! Ah, yes, that explains everything.
(Source: www.healthcare.gov)
There has been a law created, Oh Diety, called the Affordable Care Act. This law creates a Health Insurance Marketplace, a new way for individuals, families and small businesses to get health coverage. It helps uninsured people find health coverage. We beseech you, Oh Diety, to lend a helping hand in making sure all of our citizens receive this benefit.
NO!
It requires insurance companies to cover people with pre-existing health conditions. Our insurance company can't turn us down or charge us more because of our pre-existing health or medical condition like asthma, back pain, diabetes, or cancer.
NO!
It helps us understand the coverage we are getting. We have the right to get an easy-to-understand summary about a health plan's benefits and coverage.
NO!
It holds insurance companies accountable for rate increases. They are generally required to follow the 80/20 rule: to spend at least 80% of the money they take in on premiums on our health care and quality improvement activities, instead of administrative, overhead, and marketing costs.
NO!
It makes it illegal for health insurance companies to arbitrarily cancel our health insurance just because we got sick. The health care law stops insurance companies from canceling our coverage just because we made a mistake on our insurance application.
NO!
It protects our choice of doctors, covers young adults under 26, and provides free preventive care. We can choose any available primary care provider in our insurance plan's network. We may be able to get insured under our parent's plan if we're under 26 ears old. And there are many health plans that are required to cover certain preventive care services at no cost to us.
NO!
It ends lifetime and yearly dollar limits on coverage of essential health benefits. Insurance companies can't set a dollar limit on what they spend on essential health benefits for our care during the entire time we're enrolled in that plan.
NO! NO! NO!
Wait a minute. You aren't the Diety to whom we always pray. Who are you anyway? Who, did you say? John Boehner?! Ah, yes, that explains everything.
(Source: www.healthcare.gov)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)